Questions for a Covid-19 Committee:
1) Was the virus designed or the result of serial passage research?
2)Why are some institutions still advocating the long discredited natural origin theory? If there was a natural origin, why can't we find a bat population that has a precursor virus?
3)Why did the virus seem so well adapted to human transmission so quickly?
4) Why did people jump to the conclusion that it was natural?
5) Why was the Lancet letter not better vetted for potential conflicts of interest?
6) Why did the Chinese government allow wet markets to reopen if they thought the virus had its origin in a wet market?
7) What motivated the CCP coverup? When did it start, and what did the CCP know at what time? Why didn't the CCP share more information about the virus? Where did the videos of people dying in the street come from? Why did they allow people to think fomite transmission could occur?
8) What motivated the NIH coverup? To what extent was the NIH coordinated with the CCP---and why? Why was the NIH allowed to fund research going on in China, even indirectly?
9) What is the extent of Dr. Fauci's criminal liability?
10) Was the virus released accidentally, or did the CCP release it as a limited strike bioweapon---a bioweapon with deniability---hoping that its authoritarian ability to lockdown would demonstrate its superiority and allow its economy to overtake the West faster?
11) How were Facebook, Youtube, and Twitter all roped into carrying out very similar censorship regimes? What government and social pressure caused this?
12) Why didn't the NIH and CDC early on use tests to trace the transmission of the virus, instead using them for diagnosis even though there was no readily available treatment option at the time?
13) Why did the CDC and NIH ignore the most successful epidemiological models in favor of more traditional ones? (A friend of mine had his model rejected for "not including seasonality" even though Covid had not been around for a year yet when it was built and, more importantly, being the most accurate model.)
14) Why does the NIH place clinicians in positions of power instead of epidemiologists? More importantly, why do the NIH and CDC hire so few trained statisticians and economists? Why was the CDC's data collection so poor?
15) Why was there such a huge emphasis on vaccinating children? Was this really about getting immunity from liability for the vaccine manufacturers, or did the CDC really believe children were at risk?
And that is just the tip of the iceberg.
During a recent Tom Woods podcast, the question came up, Why did the CDC deny the well understood truth that diseases produce natural immunity. Here is my answer: As for why they questioned natural immunity, I can think of three reasons: 1) Because they knew the Covid tests were inaccurate and that many people who had thought they had Covid actually had the flu. However, instead of admitting this, they questioned well-established science. Recall that flu "went to virtually zero" according to CDC findings which is not possible. This suggests there was a wild tendency to overattribute symptoms to Covid-19. 2) They wanted to sell vaccine. 3) They knew it was man-made, and so they wondered if the virus had not, somehow, been intentionally designed to evade the human immune response.
Stefan Molyneux's Case Against China:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCdlmYnwC3Q&ab_channel=NoVacks4Me