Any person who still has his sanity knows there is something wrong with the way Joe Biden interacts with children and minors. Of course, having lived through the 80’s and 90’s, I can tell you that there were a number of us who had a similar feeling about Michael Jackson: And yet many people refused to accept the obvious truth about him; indeed, one would often be chastised in public for suggesting there was anything off about the man’s sexuality. Emotional investment can blind people to facts: This is precisely why creepy uncles are able to carry out their attacks. In the case of Jackson, people were blinded by their love for his music; in the case of Biden, people are blinded by their hatred of Trump.
Let’s review all the evidence against Joe Biden. Then ask yourself whether you would trust your child with him.
1. Ashley Biden’s Diary:
The first thing to realize is that the diary, while obtained illegitimately by the thieves, is a real document despite the left’s protests to the contrary: The very fact that the FBI raided Project Veritas, as well as the court proceedings surrounding the guilty pleas the two thieves submitted, attest to its veracity. Neither the FBI nor the White House has claimed that the published pages were falsified. This is, of course, because they were not falsified.
We have other pages from the same diary, written in the same handwriting and in the same style, that clearly identify the owner as Ashley Biden. So, if these segments are made up, then the whole diary was made up—in which case you have to wonder why Project Veritas bothered paying thieves for the diary, let alone sending them out for more material—both facts attested to by the criminal complaints filed against the thieves. Diary Thieves Plead Guilty
Pages from Ashley Biden's Diary
Here is what Ashley Biden’s journal says:
“Was I molested? I thinks so - I rarely remember specifics but I do remember trauma.”
“@ a y[o]ung age; showers w/ my dad (probably not appropriate)”
“being wiped until too late in the game”
2. The Evidence Provided by the C-SPAN Tapes
Please watch the above video in full and ask yourself what you would think about it if the man featured was not a famous politician. Why is he asking young girls not to date seriously until they are thirty? Clearly, it is a way of introducing sexual topics while simultaneously creating a pretext of deniability: “I was telling them not to date.” Of course, he isn’t saying that. He is saying not to date seriously—an intentionally ambiguous phrase that opens up the possibility of simply hooking up unseriously. We will see this pattern occur over and over again.
A) Christopher Coons’ Family
Now, let’s consider the positioning. Why isn’t Biden standing next to the Senator—after all, it is his swearing in. No, he must have the youngest daughter closest to him and then the wife. Does this placement seem natural? And why is he whispering in her ear and going in for a kiss. You can then see the mother steping in, patting him on the shoulder, which is generally a signal to desist. The girl clearly is recoiling, and no psychologically normal person would do this.
B) Cory Gardner’s Family
The video begins innocently enough, though a full grown man would generally not say that a young boy is “handsome.” However, why is Biden placing his hand on the girl’s stomach? Certainly, one should not touch the child at all—but if one were to do so, a hand on the shoulder would be more appropriate. Naturally speaking, any sign of affections in the photo should be between the family members—with Biden smiling affably at the recently sworn-in Senator’s side. Finally, once the picture is taken, we see Biden once again leaning in to whisper in the girl’s ear—a pattern that will become all too familiar. Biden’s hand then lingers by her waist well after the shot is over. I have literally dated women and not been this forward with them even after several dates.
Biden’s hand should not be anywhere near that girl’s waist.
C) Steve Daines’ Family
With an older family member, we see Biden’s familiar waist move. Luckily, Biden avoids anything more untold with Steve Daines’ younger niece while the picture is being taken—placing his hand on her right shoulder which, while not as appropriate as simply not touching the poor girl at all would be, is among the more innocent forms physical interaction could take. However, once the picture is taken, we can see Biden’s hand gravitating towards her right breast. Why should he be near this girl at all now that the picture has been taken?
But perhaps you think the child thought nothing of it—that the touch was not sexual. Let’s see what Steve Daines’ own niece later said about it.
Now, please rewatch that section of the video. You can clearly see Maria moving away. Does it still seem so innocent to you?
Now, before the second picture is taken, Joe Biden makes a remark about needing to “keep the guy’s away from your sister.” Why? This is a Senate swearing in ceremony. There is no reason to be making sexualized jokes. After this much time in politics, why hasn’t Biden developed a more G-rated shtick.
Of course, his “I like kids better than people” is a troubling remark. Innocent if it were not accompanied by other actions, it suggests both a fondness for children and a tendency to view them as objects. Again, this would not count for much, but it gains some weight in the light of his bizarre behaviours.
D) Jim Risch
Why is Joe Biden asking to take a picture “just alone,” as he puts it? Isn’t this odd?
Let’s See Some More Examples of Joe Making Inappropriate Comments to Young Ladies:
Creepy Joe II: The Future Journalist
Internet roasts 'creepy' Joe Biden 'sniffing' more than ice cream - YouTube
Hunter’s Phone
Hunter refers to his father as “Pedo Pete.” Certainly an odd nickname. (Please do not call the numbers listed; likely it no longer belongs to the Biden’s and none of us want a visit from the secret service.) Imagine that Donald Trump Jr. referred to his father as “Pussy Grabbing Don” or “Pedo Don.” Would the media be interested in that? Yet the media refuses to take any interest in this.
The “grandpa’s” obvious preference for young girls.
If Biden really is just an old man who enjoys interacting with kids in a paternal, innocent way, why does he seems so much more eager to touch young women, and smell their hair, than he is to interact with young boys. The presence of a clear gender preference is a strong indicator that—at least on some level—Biden is acting on sexual feelings and impulses. While educators can have gender biases, these often have more to do with behavioural differences between the sexes and are unlikely to manifest themselves in casual, friendly interactions the way Biden’s do.
The evidence that there is something wrong with Biden is overwhelming.