I agree with Ashley Keller and the points he made in his debate with John Allison even though Allison was right to point out that some companies are acting under government compulsion ("regulation by raised eyebrow"---the regulations are so impossible to follow the regulator can always get you on something if you don't do what he wants which gives him the power to insist on actions technically outside the scope of his formal regulatory power), certainly not all are: We should use the anti-trust law to punish woke corporations who try to use their economic power to control what people think and to limit the freedom of everyday people who have done nothing but say things on the internet. But even if you are not comfortable overtly taking legislative and executive action---once we get back into power---against these conglomerates, there is another alternative: You can shrug. Simply refuse to defend them when the democrats decide to take anti-trust action against them. And there still are enough democrats who don't see corporate America as their ally to ensure that these companies can experience a great deal of pain if Republicans simply stop defending them.
If you are not comfortable violating their rights despite their constant violation of yours (and of the law in numerous forms) because you still have "scruples" and "principles" (things I have long since abandoned because I think of us as being in a state of political cold war---or rather modified just as war requires one to modify his precepts), at least don't defend them. Leave them to the rapacious left they decided to support. Would you risk your life to save the life of a man who had just spat in your face? Maybe you would not be comfortable hurting him, but why save him? Similarly, why burn political capital defending our enemies?
The truth is that corporate America has come to take conservatives' defense of the free market---and of their rights no matter what political actions they take---for granted. In fact, this dynamic has created a perverse incentive: Imagine a scenario where there were two rival gangs, one insisted on protection money and the other refused to collect it on principle. Obviously, businesses would pay off and do favors for the protection collection group, because that is the group they are afraid of. Similarly, corporate America has decided to butter up the left. Of course, some corporate heads, being Ivy League and progressive college educated, do actually believe this stuff, but don't underestimate the extent to which they are simply reacting to their incentives.
The bias in our media has become overwhelming; indeed, we see more than bias, we see media outlets pushing detailed political agendas. This did not generally happen before; what has changed? These media companies are now parts of large conglomerates who look to use their media outlets "synergistically" to promote their other holdings---so the media, for example, is made to support the interests of Pfizer if the outlet is owned by a conglomerate that has a major interest in Pfizer. I do not see how we can save democracy without remedying these perverse incentives---so news once again becomes news, not advertising.
By simply refusing to intervene to defend them, we can make them realize they need the right's support in order to continue to exist. This will hopefully push them in the direction of becoming more politically neutral.
Shrug, baby, shrug.