Wallensky and Fauci have lied to Congress yet again: She claimed that VAERS reporting is tainted by death reports that are unrelated to the vaccine. However, reporting to VAERS is not mandatory and one does not generally report deaths that are not plausibly vaccine related. Second, if one did, that would be true for all other vaccines, so you still have to explain the spikes (certain batches seem much more lethal than others) as well as the higher overall death rate that accompany this vaccine and its rollout both overall and to certain demographic groups in particular. Furthermore, even on a per capita basis, this vaccine has caused many more deaths---in fact, more than all other vaccines administered since VAERS went in.
Take, for example, flu vaccines. Roughly 40% of adults get the flu vaccine each year. If Wallensky is right about VAERS' numbers being inflated by non-vaccine related death, why isn't the flu vaccine showing similar numbers (adjusted per capita) to Covid? Sorry, but what she is saying simply does not add up.
There have been careful estimates about how much vaccine related death and injury makes it into VAERS---the estimates are that it is somewhere between one and ten percent. That means only one event in a hundred, or---at best---one event in ten.
Also, Wallensky told Congress that she would produce alternate numbers that account for these “unrelated” deaths, but no alternative source of information exists. VAERS is the only reporting system. Where did these "other numbers" come from? Either Wallensky is lying, or she and Fauci have been withholding much needed information from the public.
It is ironic that Wallensky is using an argument that has been used—-correctly—to explain why the Covid-19 numbers, esp. the US numbers, are likely inflated, namely the argument that the numbers don’t distinguish between dying from Covid as opposed to with Covid, to explain away the high VAERS numbers. It is as if the CDC drones chose this argument specifically to troll us (see, we can do the same thing you are doing to us) despite the fact that it is true of the Covid death numbers and not true of VAERS. Lastly, VAERS was their system: And while every study of it has suggested it massively underreports deaths (including a study out of Harvard), why should we trust the CDC if they cannot even build a reliable reporting system to track the safety of their product. You cannot create a trash system and then use its trashiness to claim these vaccines are safe. I think the Yiddish term for these sorts of moves is chutzpah.
Accusing Rand Paul of spreading misinformation that led to Fauci being threatened seems to be so out of line with the decorum associated with a Senate hearing that I have to ask: Isn't Fauci playing with fire? Fauci’s behavior justifies the use of the Inherent Contempt power. He should be seized by the Sergeant at Arms and jailed for a day so that he learns some damn manners. Fauci should realize that Rand Paul played no role in this. It is Fauci’s own policies and his constant lying that are causing these threats, and Rand Paul’s website lacks the reach to be “responsible” for his harassment. It is much more likely to be the result of people like Tucker Carlson exposing Fauci’s constant mendacity (not that this would make Tucker responsible either; the people most responsible for these threats are those making them and Dr. Fauci himself). I suppose journalism now should be considered a crime because it might lead some people to harass others.
But Fauci’s misbehavior extends beyond his unjustified accusations against Dr. Paul. The bastard called a Senator a moron on a hot microphone. I know he thought no one else could hear, but does that really matter? His behavior is egregious and letting it go unpunished might encourage others to behave similarly. In any normal corporate setting, calling your boss or a major customer a moron on a hot microphone would get you fired---intentional or not. Why do we have lower standards for our public servants?
These people lie so often my brain has almost stopped doing the work of trying to detect it and produce these refutations—Wallensky and Fauci have long passed the point of being tiresome.
Fauci is Stalin-level evil; one of the most evil men in human history. It's hard to explain to people how the present masker-regime is as evil as the great 20th Century mass-murder-regimes, because mass-murder is so much more dramatic than mass-masking, but I can feel that it's just as evil, although along another dimension of evilness. This regime hates God and therefore covers the human face that is the focal point of God's image in the world.